DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7O1 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
SIN
Docket No: 1292-14
12 March 2015
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 24 February 2015.. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your .
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
11 December 2012. On 19 December 2012, you were diagnosed with
an adjustment disorder with depressed mood that existed prior to
your entry into the service, You were counseled regarding your
condition, and advised to seek treatment after separation.
Based on the mental evaluation, you were processed for separation
by reason of erroneous enlistment. On 27 December 2012, after
you were advised of your rights, you elected to receive copies of
documents to be forwarded to the separation authority, but waived
all your other procedural rights. Subsequently, on 7 January
2013 you were discharged with an entry level separation by reason
of erroneous enlistment. At that time you were assigned an RE-4
reentry code as a result of your diagnosis.
The Board, in its review of your record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
‘your brief period of service and desire to change your RE-4
reentry code. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors
were not sufficient to warrant such a change of your reentry code
given your diagnosed personality disorder. In this regard, you
were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your
circumstances. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken, You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in your case. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice. . .
Si rely,
ROBERT J. O’ NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1206 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 2015. Since you enlisted in error, you were assigned the most appropriate reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00285-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code which was correctly assigned based on your diagnosed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02686-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 January 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant any change in your reentry code, and narrative reason for separation,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6180 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. appropriate reentry code based on your » Situation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4526 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. At that time you were assigned an RE-3G reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9393 14_Redacted
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You did not respond in a timely manner and were honorably discharged from the TDRL program, and assigned an RE-3P (physical disability) reentry code. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reentry code given the fact you were offered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4508 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01700 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 November 2012. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-8 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to a medical condition that existed prior to entry into the service and failed to complete initial training. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5150 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 May 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1223 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...